It’s Good to Know LEED AP Synergies

February 22, 2008 – 1:32am

synergy (syn·er·gy)

  1. the interaction of two or more agents or forces so that their combined effect is greater than the sum of their individual effects.
  2. cooperative interaction among groups, especially among the acquired subsidiaries or merged parts of a corporation, that creates an enhanced combined effect.
  3. the name I would give to an energy drink I invent, but I’d replace the “y” with an “i” and serve it exclusively at high-end clubs for great-tasting jager-bombs.

Synergies in LEED are very important and is an essential ingredient in designing successful green buildings. Plus, they may show up on the test in one form or another - so pay attention.

Understanding synergies in LEED means understanding how different design strategies are interconnected and may contribute to more than one LEED credit. Synergies aren’t always good though, as some strageties can be great for one credit but terrible for another - at the same time. I’ll outline some examples for you:

  1. Rainwater Collection
    • Good Synergies
      1. collecting from roof runoff reduces quantity of stormwater to be managed
      2. saves fees associated with handling runoff volumes
      3. resource for landscape irrigation
      4. source of non-potable water for flushing toilets and urinals
      5. provides opportunity to displace potable water use for HVAC (water for cooling towers)
  2. Daylighting
    • Good Synergies
      1. can reduce need for electric lighting
      2. capture savings in electricity
      3. capture savings from reduced cooling loads and downsizing cooling equipment
      4. can provide passive solar heating
      5. may permit elimination of perimeter heating
      6. an integrated design effort may include addressing operating costs for both electricity and natural gas, environmental impacts related to energy consumption, initial costs for heating and cooling, the quality of lighting and thermal comfort.
    • Bad Synergies
      1. in cold-climate, skin-load dominated buildings, great daylighting may mean poor insulation (roof, walls and glazing). This could raise overall heating loads for the building.
      2. innapropiate fenestration (the placement of windows on a building’s facade) can also lead to overheating of occupants near windows, glare problems, and higher cooling loads in the summer.
  3. Light Colored Pervious Paving
    • Good Synergies
      1. reduces heat-island effects
      2. reduction of stormwater runoff
      3. treatment of stormwater runoff
      4. improved mid-summer microclimate thermal comfort
      5. reduction of cooling loads
      6. possible rainwater collection for irrigation and flushing
    • Bad Synergies
      1. if implemented innapropiately in a winter-dominated climate and/or with insufficient drainage, potential benefits may be reduced and may actually increase overall energy consumption and cause maintainance problems.
        • i.e. having to plow snow that would of melted on black asphalt
        • snow removal equipment may damage the paving
        • cracking and buckling of the paving due to bad drainage and build up of silt
  4. Use of Wheatboard
    • Good Synergies
      1. Initially more expensive, but saves money due to it’s durability compared to sheetrock.
        • saves costs on installation and maintainance
      2. The benefits associated with using a renewable agricultural byproduct
    • Bad Synergies
      1. if used with a finish or stain high up on walls, distribution of daylight may be severely constrained (because wheatboard is relatively dark)
        • here, it would absorb light rather than reflect it deeper into spaces.
        • this would result in a reduced displacement of electric lighting and greater energy consumption.
      2. because of the reduced thermal mass of wheatboard, in some cases this may lead to greater fluctuations in interior temperatures
  5. Vegetated Roofs (every practice exam I’ve seen involved vegetated roofs in some fashion)
    • Good Synergies
      1. reduction of roof rainwater runoff
      2. reduction of heat-island effects
      3. reduction of cooling loads by buffering roof membrane from sun exposure and through evapotranspiration.
        • this can reduce electric power demand and permit downsizing of cooling equipment and save costs
      4. vegetation and soil also provide an added layer of insulation to prevent escape of winter heating energy from the building
      5. aesthetic appeal
      6. can communicate leadership in sustainability in the community
      7. provide habitat for birds and other wildlife

I just wanted to say thank you for making intheleed.com a successful and fun resource for me to work on. I will continue to provide you helpful information that I’ve learned while studying for my exam which I take in exactly 10 days. I’ll also keep it going after I pass! (knock on wood) Wish me luck! After only two weeks of launching intheleed.com, I surpassed 10,000 overall visitors today - and I hope I can someday reach 1,000,000! Thank you so much! Cheers!

PrintThis PrintThis
  1. 7 Responses to “It’s Good to Know LEED AP Synergies”

  2. Hi Pat,

    I just found out that you commented on Our Green Journey a few days ago — thanks! I am going to be studying for my LEED AP, so this blog will definitely be of great help. Keep up the great work!

    By Lisa Galley on Feb 22, 2008

  3. Thanks Lisa! I hope the blog proves to be helpful for you. Good luck studying, and you can be sure I’ll be subscribing to “Our Green Journey” too!

    By Pat on Feb 22, 2008

  4. Did you derive the ‘bad synergies’ directly from the LEED study materials? The only reason I ask is that the list of bad synergies for light colored pervious paving is not entirely correct. If the study materials are not qualifying these statements, it could potentially result in developers being somewhat discouraged from using this pervious materials.

    Here are the reasons why I believe the statements are not entirely correct.

    In cold climates (like Minnesota)snow fall on an existing pervious parking area usually disappears on its own before snow on the adjacent, darker colored, impervious suface. Manual snow removal from this pervious surface has seldom been necessary.

    If pervious paving systems are installed properly, snow plows will not damage them (if operated properly). Proper operation includes installation of skids or wheels on the shovel to keep it lifted slightly off of the paver surface.

    If bad drainage occurs around a pervious surface, then the pervious surface location was a bad choice (someone didn’t do a proper site analysis), the paver bed was improperly prepared, or runoff from an adjacent area is being improperly directed to the pervious surface. Runon to a pervious surface should never be allowed unless it is a deliberate part of the drainage design (which for most pervious systems is NOT the case). Additionally, siltation also should not occur if the pervious system was properly designed and on-site conditions remain consistent with the design conditions. Most pervious systems seldom need vacuuming, even after years of operation - again, so long as runon is not allowed and the pervious system has ben properly installed in an appropropriate location.

    Just my 2 cents. Obviously we are being tested on what the LEED study materials say. Hopefully these types of discrepancies will be cleared up over time as we all become more familiar with sustainable design practices and materials.

    By Jim Jones on Jun 14, 2008

  5. Another good synergy with green roofs is that it can contribute to SS cr. 5.2: Site Development: Maximize Open Space. If the project qualifies for SS cr. 2 about development density, then green roofs can be counted as open space.

    By Jen Millikan on Aug 2, 2008

  6. Hello, is there a site or place on this site that has the breakdown of needed ASTM standards for the LEED-NC exam?

    By Heather on Sep 3, 2008

  7. Hi Heather,

    I’m sorry to say that there has not yet been a list of the ASTM standards for the NC Exam on this website. It’s a good idea though, so here it is for you:

    ASTM E1903 “Phase II Environmental Site Assessment.” (SSc3)

    ASTM C1371-04 “Standard Test Method for Determination of Emittance of Materials Near Room Temperature Using Portable Emissometers.” (SSc7.2)

    ASTM C1549-04 “Standard Test Method for Determination of Solar Reflectance Near Ambient Temperature Using a Portable Solar Reflectometer.” (SSc7.2)

    ASTM E408-71 “Standard Test Methods for Total Normal Emittance of Surfaces Using Inspection Meter Techniques.” (SSc7.2)

    ASTM E903-96 “Standard Test Method for Solar Absorptance, Reflectance and Transmittance of Materials Using Integrated Spheres.” (SSc7.2)

    ASTM E1918-97 “Standard Test Method for Measuring Solar Reflectance of Horizontal and Low-Sloped Surfaces in the Field.” (SSc7.2)

    ASTM E1980-01 “Standard Practice for Calculating Solar Refletance of Horizontal and Low-Sloped Opaque Surfaces.” (SSc7.2)

    ANSI/ASTM E779-03 “Standard Test Method for Determining Air Leakage Rate by Fan Pressurization.” (EQp2)

    NOTE: you don’t necessarily have to waste your time with memorizing all of the crazy names for each of these, as far as the exam is concerned. Just know which ones go with which credit.

    I hope this helps, and thanks - I’m sure others will find this useful too.

    Good luck and let me know if you have any more questions. Cheers!

    By Pat on Sep 4, 2008

  8. Thank you, so much.

    By Heather on Sep 4, 2008

Post a Comment



About Pat